View Full Version : Finally! The UD vs UD audio!
DrZaP84
04-30-2005, 01:03 PM
Here it is guys, sorry ive been busy and such. But here is the UD vs UD mirror! Enjoy...hopefully...
UD VS UD Audio (http://rapidshare.de/files/1499947/ud_vs_ud.zip.html)
Super-Mouse
04-30-2005, 01:51 PM
Awww man you shoulda got the job ah well :angry: . Great audio again tho :cool2:
Dakonblackblade
04-30-2005, 02:38 PM
Thx zap u r great trying and make these audios.Keep them coming man
Grommash
05-01-2005, 07:01 AM
Why the **** they didn't gave u the damn job?! am sure there is no one who would suit this AC job more than u Zap ! since this AC is an example of how much ur audios owns. It was pure sex as u might say. ;) and about the Oger's asses thing.....dude that was freakin halarios XD it really made my day.
IC.Shadow
05-01-2005, 06:35 PM
Why the **** they didn't gave u the damn job?! am sure there is no one who would suit this AC job more than u Zap !
No offense, but since you didn't hear any of the submissions, you're really in no place to speak that way.
Complimenting him is fine. Downgrading the achievements others have made is not. I realise you're just trying to voice support for him, but you can't just make comments like that when you don't know what else was submitted.
DrZaP84
05-01-2005, 08:07 PM
Super-Mouse thanks man
Dakon ty for compliment
Gromassh, again thank you for support.
I.C. Shadow Im well aware that there were obviously better acers than myself. And I am not complaining about your choice. I was just bummed I didnt get picked was all. But I fully understand that there were better people qualified than myself. Its fine. I appreciated the chance anyways, and I cant wait to see who you guys pick. Hopefully maybe L0tus or Enowe those are people that truly deserve the A.C. spot. Hell, they were the two people who got me started in wanting to do an A.C. And I want this site to maintain the quality it has had over the year that I have been here. And On gromash's defense, I dont think he was really downgrading anyone's achievements. Because who ever gets picked definitly is qualified as an audio commentator.
However, I do think 1 minute was a little bit too little. And I will admit, that I probably went over the minute mark. I just didn't see what one minute could really do. But anyways thats not important. Good luck with the next round whoever made it! And I will be sure to listen to the new acers audios.
Grommash
05-02-2005, 04:43 AM
No offense, but since you didn't hear any of the submissions, you're really in no place to speak that way. Complimenting him is fine. Downgrading the achievements others have made is not. I realise you're just trying to voice support for him, but you can't just make comments like that when you don't know what else was submitted.
Where did i exactlly mentioed anything about other AC'ers? i know my post wasn't that clear since i forgot to put "IMO" in the end of it, but i was just kinda voting for Zap thats all, and am sorry if i made a misunderstanding situation.
Just a thought though.... i think there should've been a poll here at the MAC'er's board, and u should've waited for the results before u made ur choice, coz who could say who is a better commentaror more than the users of WCR? u know we're the ppl who download and listen to AC's right?
Stig_rename
05-02-2005, 06:56 AM
I have no interest in UD but I decided to check out your audio anyway.
I was applying for Audio commentator too, I got past first stage bit after starting to record my audio for the second stage I thought to myself that I really don't have a good enough voice for it :(
You got a good voice, clear and interesting and flows well, so although you didn't get the job, keep up the audios, they are good!
L0tus
05-02-2005, 07:44 AM
Zap. Your audio pwned. You're frikin' hilarious. I really hope that you don't let this "AC job" thing bum you out. Keep making audios cos I for one think you're a great ACer.:)
DrZaP84
05-02-2005, 03:21 PM
Stig: Your first audio was really good, so you'd def. be a really good acers, just dont say "ehm" a million times hehe.
And lotus did you apply? Cuz if you didn't well than that would be a loss to wcr imo. So yea, you better of applied, and than I expect a lotus audio once a week :O
Stig_rename
05-02-2005, 06:15 PM
Stig: Your first audio was really good, so you'd def. be a really good acers, just dont say "ehm" a million times hehe.
Thanks but thats the problem, I found myself doing the same thing in the audio I was preparing for the wcreplays application.
Unfortunately I don't seem to have the "gift of the gab" so the words don't flow out as well as some people, so I end up "ehm"ing :(
DrZaP84
05-02-2005, 09:28 PM
Stig, i hope you fixed it right? I dunno be like a gosu editor or something, and like edit out the ehms, cuz wcreplays needs a good hu commentary. Oh Stig, maybe if its not too much trouble could you do an audio on another human mirror. Uh...the 46 min. game between omgg and uh that other guy. Its on the front page. Id like to hear your thoughts on why the game lasted almost an hour on such a small map as echo isles.
Here it is (http://wcreplays.com/replays.php?get=5960)
IC.Shadow
05-02-2005, 10:23 PM
Where did i exactlly mentioed anything about other AC'ers?
I was referring to the "no one else could fit the position better" part, because since you haven't heard all of the applications, you really wouldn't know who is suited and who isn't. ;)
Just a thought though.... i think there should've been a poll here at the MAC'er's board, and u should've waited for the results before u made ur choice, coz who could say who is a better commentaror more than the users of WCR?
Yeah, but just because one audio is good, doesn't mean a person necessarily deserves a staff position, nor does it encompass previous behaviour, nor does it make clear any potential issues that may arise once the person is on staff. A member poll could, under the right circumstances, be helpful, but I'd like to think that the people doing the hiring - people with months or even years of experience in doing so - know what they are doing, and since our entire goal is to find the people that best inform and entertain the members, I'd say we do a fairly good job of that. After all, lots of us are audio fans just like you are, and chances are good that our likes in audios will mirror yours.
u know we're the ppl who download and listen to AC's right?
Well, yeah, but you and the other people who view this forum regularly make up about 0.1% of the total group of people who download audios, so your input wouldn't necessarily be any more or less reliable than anyone else's.
KoD-Dan
05-02-2005, 10:29 PM
Well, yeah, but you and the other people who view this forum regularly make up about 0.1% of the total group of people who download audios
That is why I'm kind of confused as to why we aren't allowed to advertise in member chat.
The audience reached here is very minimal, and I know it could be more if people just knew about it.
Gladiator
05-02-2005, 10:35 PM
That is why I'm kind of confused as to why we aren't allowed to advertise in member chat.
The audience reached here is very minimal, and I know it could be more if people just knew about it.
I thought you were, if you kept it to 1 thread (i could be wrong, but thats what i thought)
IC.Shadow
05-02-2005, 10:38 PM
That is why I'm kind of confused as to why we aren't allowed to advertise in member chat.
The audience reached here is very minimal, and I know it could be more if people just knew about it.
Yeah, Glad's right, I don't think anyone minds the occasional link to the forum. The only time I, personally, was annoyed was when one guy posted three links to one audio (he posted the same thread 3 days in a row), and then started doing the same thing when he posted his next audio as well.
As long as you're not mass posting about how you made an audio, then no problem. Also, lots of people put links in their sigs. You might consider that.
Sly0_0
05-03-2005, 12:36 AM
Great humor and good tips
Grommash
05-03-2005, 05:33 AM
Well, yeah, but you and the other people who view this forum regularly make up about 0.1% of the total group of people who download audios, so your input wouldn't necessarily be any more or less reliable than anyone else's.
Yeah that did make a lot of sense obviously, i guess am just gonna wait and see which AC'er u'll choose anyway.
L0tus
05-03-2005, 06:22 AM
@DrZap: Yeah I applied for the AC job and sent them a full AC. (But I don't know...I did a human game (and I've never played HU) and spent the first quarter of the AC cracking a lame-ass joke :p. oh well...fingers crossed :D)
@Shadow: It sure would be great if member audios, at least, got a decent link on the audios frontpage ;)
DrZaP84
05-03-2005, 04:32 PM
Well, good Lotus youd be a good addition to the wcr staff. And wcr was def. wise in moving you to the next round. Hopefully Enowe made it as well ^^
Orange
05-20-2005, 09:11 PM
well, I like l0tus' suggestion, because member writings get there right? so why not put up the occasional member audio's?
Frozgard
05-23-2005, 02:51 PM
At least some more exposure for member audios would be great. Some of them are really good and don't pale in comparison to the "official" ones. So it's a pity that 99% of the people who visit WCR never even see them.
cp_manat
05-25-2005, 08:37 PM
what a terrible bump
DrZaP84
05-25-2005, 08:45 PM
Meh, I like the exposure we have right now. Just the fact that we can do audios is quite sweet.
TaintedSun: Yes, it is.
Cp_manat: lol
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.