inb4 Snowi
I dont make threads often but I need the genius minds of wcr to help me here!
Christine has been found guilty of breaching section 3 of the Promotion of Manitoba as a Better Place to do Business Act which reads as follows:
“Any person who commits internet fraud in the province of Manitoba will be guilty of an offence where it is proven that that the commission of the fraud has caused loss to a business in Manitoba.”
The expressed reason for this law is that investors are likely to avoid investing in Manitoba if they believe that the province is not one which can offer them appropriate protection from internet fraud.
The Manitoba Legislature is also about to enact a law prohibiting people from polluting the Winnipeg City Park having issued a public statement that environmental pollution in Canada needs to be dealt with strongly.
Christine seeks as to whether (a) she was legally convicted and (b) if the Manitoba Legislature can pass the new environmental law
any ideas
______________________________LmaO
Originally Posted by teneighty
inb4 Snowi
______________________________Originally Posted by SilverHaren
How does one know if Christine's actions caused loss to a business in Manitoba?
______________________________"Do you serve a purpose or purposely serve?"
Well i guess thats not important as she has been already found guilty. The question is, has she been legally convicted.
Or maybe not. I hate this question....
______________________________LmaO
Originally Posted by teneighty
i'd send this question to EL NEGRO INFERNAL if it was given to me
______________________________"Do you serve a purpose or purposely serve?"
This is /WCR/, every person that visits these boards is an expert in law. Just a matter if someone will help you.
______________________________Originally Posted by Day(9)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)