It would probably make Footmen fairly crappy again, especially after defend is nerfed in 405, and it might even be more nerfed before release.
If defend (i'm talking about the insane new defend with reflecting) came 2nd tier, how would that affect gameplay?
It would probably make Footmen fairly crappy again, especially after defend is nerfed in 405, and it might even be more nerfed before release.
I reckon they should make Reflect a separate upgrade to Defend. Defend can stay tier 1, and be a little cheaper. Reflect should be tier 2, so as to still encourage tier2 use of footmen with less potential impact on balance (which, in 1.16, is so delicately balanced already!)
______________________________- Delfius
"I gave up Warcraft III to get a life, but since discovered that life is overrated"
Delfius's Guide to Far-Sighted MASS RAIDERS
Reflect is fine as it is, since footmen don't have a whole mess of HP, low damage, and low move speed, especially with defend (outmicro city) 2 rifles can still beat 3 footmen on an even playing field.
Defend's reflect keeps footies playable is all. Don't like reflect? Don't mass wyverns.
______________________________Meru's guide to Night Elf in FFA
Talk to me using "u" or "ur" in place of real worlds and I'll either ignore you or make fun of you.
queen of PANS (People against net-slang)
Take a guess
I think Orc players' problems are not caused as much by foot vs wyvern but foot vs burrow or foot vs tower. having reflect at tier 2 could kind of help that problem, but personally i think thats why you use grunts to kill footies not burrows.
______________________________Can't be bothered to make another sig that falls within 450 x 75.
foots no longer reflect on buildings
I think tier 1 reflect is too much for a tier 1 upgrade. Make defend and reflect different upgrades is fine with me.
______________________________FearTheTerp and Rabid-Skunk on West
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)